Skip to content

replace unclear guidance with project spelling policy #795

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

@tshepang tshepang commented Jan 6, 2025

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 6, 2025

r? @Dylan-DPC

rustbot has assigned @Dylan-DPC.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 6, 2025
@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

For what is may be worth, I don't feel strongly neither for or against such suggestion but I am in favor of merging it so at least we take a side. My reasoning is that It's not a policy so it will not be enforced, I assume that adding this to the docs shouldn't create roadblocks to contributions.

wdyt @jackh726 ?

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

I think this should be deferred to @rust-lang/release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants